🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.